I don't see what you are fussing about. I personally still only own a ps2 and in my spare time I play Okami and... actually, I'm pretty much only playing Pro Evo, because I'm addicted to the premier league, and football, and goals - pretty ones- but nevermind...
Ah, I read this article and immediately only thought 'damn Microsoft, I know they are being exaggerative but from my experience the majority of people I know have Xboxes and as I can assume they have all lived for the past 20 years (as they have body hair and claim to have lived at least that long), I can assume their talk of old games refere to the lovely (aforementioned) ps2.(as the mentioned games appeared on the console)."
SO my actual thought train wasn't so elaborately explanatory, but they are my thoughts so I understand them better.
And I see clearly now that this is more of a ramble, but I haven't been near the forums of late (out of chronic SS4 fear).
Quickly then, my point is that most of the people i know do have Xboxes, did have ps2's and are talking more and more (or going ahead with it) about buying ps3's. I still only own a ps2, I am happy enough as I don't make enough money and can't afford enough time to justify the expense to expand. Well, I could get a 360 like, but I wouldn't buy such a cheap and ugly machine... This article is not biased, some of the posters are of course, as peronal opinion makes for lovely free debate (about noisy clunky unshapely...), it is a report on a claim by Microsoft that is exaggerative but not entirely untrue. I read it and my opinion on Microsoft and the Xbox didn't even flutter in the slightest breeze of change. I think the majority of 360 owners may move on to a ps3, but that will be decided upon by Nitendo and Microsoft and time, and not by Spong brainwashing readers (into wanting to buy such a piece of shi...).
And anyway, brand loyalty is all petty nonsense for fools...
The "Underwater Castle" was simply a castle until we got Global Warming. No one ever said it was a waterproof underwater castle. We sit at our desks in Scuba gear.
When I say "we", I mean "they" of course. My ivory tower still peaks above the waves. I have to travel to work by rubber dinghy though.
55 comments
Ah, I read this article and immediately only thought 'damn Microsoft, I know they are being exaggerative but from my experience the majority of people I know have Xboxes and as I can assume they have all lived for the past 20 years (as they have body hair and claim to have lived at least that long), I can assume their talk of old games refere to the lovely (aforementioned) ps2.(as the mentioned games appeared on the console)."
SO my actual thought train wasn't so elaborately explanatory, but they are my thoughts so I understand them better.
And I see clearly now that this is more of a ramble, but I haven't been near the forums of late (out of chronic SS4 fear).
Quickly then, my point is that most of the people i know do have Xboxes, did have ps2's and are talking more and more (or going ahead with it) about buying ps3's. I still only own a ps2, I am happy enough as I don't make enough money and can't afford enough time to justify the expense to expand. Well, I could get a 360 like, but I wouldn't buy such a cheap and ugly machine... This article is not biased, some of the posters are of course, as peronal opinion makes for lovely free debate (about noisy clunky unshapely...), it is a report on a claim by Microsoft that is exaggerative but not entirely untrue. I read it and my opinion on Microsoft and the Xbox didn't even flutter in the slightest breeze of change. I think the majority of 360 owners may move on to a ps3, but that will be decided upon by Nitendo and Microsoft and time, and not by Spong brainwashing readers (into wanting to buy such a piece of shi...).
And anyway, brand loyalty is all petty nonsense for fools...